I'm a bit late to the party, but finally managed to get a chance to read the paper "Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays" by Harvard, QuEra, and collaborators, which hit the headlines a few weeks ago. My thoughts:
- Sadly many articles covering the paper gloss over the important distinction between error detection and error correction: QuEra's press release, The Harvard Gazette, EurekaAlert, and others. Optics & Photonics News provides more balanced coverage. The impressively high (above break-even) fidelities demonstrated in the paper require post-selection, discarding experimental runs where errors were detected. The post-selection probability is as low as 0.04% for the largest system sizes studied, and will get exponentially smaller for bigger circuits. The bottom line: scaling up to a useful size needs integration of error correction.
- How to integrate error correction? One needs to process the error detection measurements in real-time and then apply correcting gates to the qubits while the circuit is being run. Figure 4 of the paper does demonstrate implementation of measurement-dependent feedforward operations, but not yet integrated with error decoding and correction operations. This seems to be in principle an engineering challenge that can be solved with more hard work.
- Scaling up to more qubits and deeper circuits will require continuous pumping and replenishment of Rydberg atoms. Otherwise, the circuit width will be limited by the finite success probability for trapping each atom, and the depth by the ~10s trapping lifetime.
- The quantum processor architecture, involving separate storage, processing, and readout zones, as well as the ability to execute gates with arbitrary connectivity and in parallel using just a few structured laser beams, looks much more promising for scalability compared to superconducting quantum processors.
There is more discussion over at Shtetl-Optimized.
No comments:
Post a Comment